The current challenges of Mexican computer law and its legislation as a means of preventing disputes in the future
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29105/dj3.4-67Keywords:
AI, technology, law, interpretation, digital, philosophyAbstract
Artificial intelligence and technology in general have acquired the attention of the world, said technology is transcendental for the law because, as will be appreciated throughout this investigation, it must be regulated due to the social impact that it is proving to have on the lives of citizens. For this reason, understanding the way in which the law is currently related from a regulatory point of view, is what justifies investigating this topic and expressing these results.
We will study the gaps in the law, the ambiguity and vagueness of the laws in the field of the digital age, in the same way, we will address the types of legal interpretation and its resolution starting from the philosophy of law.
The contribution of this research lies in making society aware of the need to create an effective regulation for the use of technology and artificial intelligence in Mexico, it will also show the identified obstacles for which it has not been possible to legislate on this matter, in the same way, will put into debate the ethical and philosophical principles from which the search for this new legislation will be based.
Downloads
References
Blanco, J. M., & Cohen, J. (2018): Inteligencia artificial y poder. Global.
Blanco. J.M. (2019). China, el monstruo mundial en Inteligencia Artificial que utiliza cientos jueces robot. The technolawgist.
Boden.M. (1996): “The Philosophy of Artificial Life”. Oxford.
Boycer. C. (2007): Historia de la matemática, Alianza Editorial.
Brodersen. J. (2018): Libro de Natalia Zuazo. Dueños de internet: cómo el “Club de los 5” maneja el mundo. Clarín Tecnología.
Burnett, J., (1994): La aurora del pensamiento griego: Early Greek Philosophy.
Bush.V.(1945): As We May Think
Calderón. H. (1966): La Ciencia Matemática de los Mayas. Editorial Orión.
Cañedo.R. (2004): Aproximaciones para una historia de Internet. ACIMED.
Caratini. R (2004): Los matemáticos de Babilonia, Bellaterra Arqueología.
Codina. L. (2009): ¿Web 2.0, Web 3.0 o Web Semántica?: El impacto en los sistemas de información de la Web, I Congreso Internacional de Ciberperiodismo y Web 2.0. Editorial Club Universitario.
Codina. L. Marcos, M. y Pedraza. R. (2009) Web Semántica y Sistemas de Información Documental, Trea, Gijón.
Corona.S., (2018): La robot Sophia: “Los humanos son las criaturas más creativas del planeta, pero también las más destructivas”. El País.
Cortés. A., (2010): Internet y aplicaciones multimedia.
De Landa.D (1566): Relación de las Cosas de Yucatán.
Del Real Alcalá J. Alberto . (2011). La teoría del Estado de F. Meinecke.
Du. J. W. (2019). Inteligencia Artificial en China.
Escohotado. A., (1975): De physis a polis: la evolución del pensamiento griego desde Tales a Sócrates, Barcelona.
Ezquiaga. F. (2020). CUADERNO DE CONFLICTOS NORMATIVOS E INTERPRETACIÓN JURÍDICA.
Feng, E. (2019). La inteligencia artificial se desborda en China. Expansión.
Gigon. O (1968): Los orígenes de la filosofía griega: de Hesíodo a Parménides, Gredos.
Greaves. M. y Mika. P. (2008): “Semantic Web and Web 2.0”, Computer and Information Sciences.
Guastini, R. (1988): “La interpretación. Objetos, conceptos y teorías”, en Interpretación jurídica y decisión judicial.
Guastini. R. (2015). Legal Interpretation and Legal Construction. SCIELO.
Harris M (2011). Artificial Intelligence. Oxford.
Hern. A. (2019): Tim Berners-Lee on 30 years of the world wide web: ‘We can get the web we want’. The Guardian.
Hern. A. (2019): Tim Berners-Lee on 30 years of the world wide web: ‘We can get the web we want’. The Guardian.
House of commons science and technology committee (2017): Robotics and artificial intelligence, Goverment.
Hyatt.S. et al., (2013): Jennifer Skeem, Risk Technology in Sentencing: Testing the Promises and Perils. Oxford.
Kaiming.H. et al. (2015): “Delving Deep into Rectifiers: Surpassing Human-Level Performance on Imagenet Classification”. Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer visión.
Kaplan, A. y Haenlein, M. (2010): “Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of Social Media”. Business Horizons.
Labordee. S. (2000). PROBLEMAS DE LAS LAGUNAS DE LA LEY Y EL PRINCIPIO DE LA PLENITUD HERMENEÚTICA.Escuela Nacional de Jurisprudencia.
Mehrabi, Ninareh, et al. (2019): “A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learning”. arXiv preprinx.
Moor. J. (2006): “The Dartmouth College Artificial Intelligence Conference: The Next Fifty Years”. AI Magazine.
Morley.S. (1983): La civilización Maya. Stanford. University Press, Stanford.
N. Bobbio, (1988): “Reason in Law”, “La razón en el Derecho (observaciones preliminares)”. Doxa.
National Science and Technology Council Committe on Technology (2016): Preparinf for the future of artificial intelligence.
Ning. X. et al. (2020): “Explainable Deep Learning: A Field Guide for the Uninitiated”. arXiv preprint.
OCDE, (2019): "Artificial Intelligence in Society".
OCDE. (2021) "La inteligencia artificial en la sociedad" (2019).
Palmer. D. (2016) Artificial Intelligence: opportunities and implications for the future decisión making. Government Office for Science
Real Academía de la Lengua Española. (2020).: “máquina”
REAL ACADEMIA ESPAÑOLA. (2020). DEFINICIÓN: AMBIGUO/AMBIGUA. 09/03/2021, de REAL ACADEMIA ESPAÑOLA Sitio web: https://dle.rae.es/ambiguo
Reuters (2018): Creador de la Web Berners-Lee lanza contrato por una internet mejor. Reuters.
Robson.E (1999): Mesopotamian mathematics, 2100-1600 BC. Clarendon Pers Oxford.
Robson.E (1999): Mesopotamian mathematics, 2100-1600 BC. Clarendon Pers Oxford.
Robson.E (2008): Mathematics in Ancient Iraq, Princeton.
RODRÍGUEZ J.L. (1999): “Lagunas axiológicas y relevancia normativa”, Doxa Cuadernos de Filosofía del Derecho.
Rodríguez.J. (2002): Lógica de los sistemas jurídicos. Madrid, Centro de Estudios Constitucionales.
Ruiz. V. (2016). Santo Tomás de Aquino en la filosofía del derecho. SCIELO.
Russell S, Norvig P. (2009): Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach. Prentice-Hall Press.
Santillana Educacion. S.L. (2012). Sistema sexagesimal. 14/10/2021, de Santillana Educacion. S.L.
Sartor. G. (2005): Legal Reasoning. A Cognitive Approach to the Law. Dordrecht, Springer.
Select Committee on Artificial Intelligence (2017). House of Lords.
Smart Dubai. (2022) "Principios de Inteligencia Artificial”. Government.
Smart Dubai. (2022) AI Ethics Principles & Guidelines
Vigil Oliveros Enrique. (2015). LA VAGUEDAD COMO PROBLEMA LINGÜISTICO EN EL CAMPO JURÍDICO.
Wheeler. G. (2020): “Bounded Rationality”. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Winson.P. (2021) “Robótica Móvil y Autónoma,”. General.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Journal of Legal Challenges
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The authors who publish in this journal accept the following conditions:
- Authors will retain their copyright and guarantee the journal the right of first publication of their work, which will be simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. That allows third parties to share the work as long as its author and its first publication are indicated in this magazine.
- Authors may make other independent and additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the article published in this journal (eg, include it in an institutional repository or publish it in a book) provided that they clearly indicate that the work it was first published in this magazine.
- Authors are allowed and recommended to publish their work on the Internet (for example on institutional or personal pages) after the review and publication process, as it can lead to productive exchanges and a greater and faster dissemination of the published work ( See The effect of open access).
